Digitalisation earns its place onboard when it makes work simpler, not when it adds another layer to manage.

The harder task is making data, equipment, compliance and procurement work together in ways that owners can actually use. That puts greater weight on how technology is introduced and governed, and on whether the information produced can support better commercial and environmental decisions.

The technology may be available, but its usefulness still comes down to what happens after it reaches the vessel.

Cetus Maritime’s Tabitha Logan gets to the heart of a problem that sits underneath much of the industry’s digital investment: shipowners can have better connectivity and more software without necessarily having better information.

That makes her perspective particularly relevant as fleets take on more systems for fuel optimisation, emissions compliance, cybersecurity and crew connectivity. The difficulty is not simply installing those tools. It is making them work together without creating more manual work for the people onboard.

Her comments also bring a useful discipline to the discussion. Logan says Cetus is looking at how its connectivity can produce actionable insights from proven engine optimisation while reducing administrative work for crews. That puts the operator, rather than the technology, at the centre of the decision.

Her warning about data interoperability is just as important. If information remains trapped across legacy and new systems, the owner can end up with more data but less usable intelligence. The same problem can extend beyond the vessel, particularly where ships and ports operate with different systems and levels of digital maturity.

This is why we are leading with Logan’s perspective. She will also be speaking at the Digital Ship Summit, giving the industry an opportunity to take this discussion beyond software and connectivity and into the practical realities of running a connected fleet.

This is the lesson: before adding another system, ask whether it will remove work, connect information that is currently isolated, and produce something the crew or shore team can actually act on.

How much can reliable records tell a shipowner about what is really happening across the fleet? As SIRE 2.0, Port State Control and charterer vetting place greater scrutiny on evidence, connected records could help managers spot inconsistencies before they become costly commercial issues.

Can a green shipping corridor work properly without the digital infrastructure behind it? Singapore and Brazil are bringing digital information exchange into their corridor plans, giving shipowners and managers a chance to shape how vessel, port and fuel data can work together across the route.

Can onboard carbon capture make sense for an existing vessel when the equipment brings higher fuel use, lost cargo space and substantial retrofit costs? Lloyd’s Register’s findings give shipowners a clearer basis for deciding where capture technology can work commercially, with vessel age, trading patterns and CO₂ reception infrastructure all part of the calculation.

Can emissions reductions in routine ship procurement be counted with the same confidence as savings from major energy projects? Bencros has had 13,112 tonnes of CO₂e savings from recycled-rubber fenders independently verified, giving shipowners another source of Scope 3 data within their supply chains.

» Register Now «

» Secure your Delegate Pass «

» Register your Interest «

Miska Merikukka of Elomatic argues that shipyard optimisation needs greater attention if shipowners are to build and retrofit cleaner vessels at the scale required for net zero.